This is the e-mail response from NJDEP to the July 1, 2006, letter to Commissioner Jackson:

 

-------Original Message-------

>  From: Larry Baier <Larry.Baier@dep.state.nj.us>

>  Subject: Re: Fw: C-1 Buffer Letter to DEP as of July 1(27 groups)

>  Sent: 10 Jul '06 12:27

>  Dear Mr. King,

>  As you know, the antidegradation policies in the New Jersey Surface Water Quality Standards (N.J.A.C. 7:9B-1.5(d)iii.) require that Category One Waters be protected from any measurable changes (including calculable or predicted changes) to water quality.  For point source discharges this standard can be applied directly because the effluent is of a known quality and flow.  Non point sources of pollution, by their intermittent nature and variable quality characteristics do not lend themselves to an "end of pipe analysis."  Therefore, non point sources of pollution have historically been controlled through the application of best management practices.  Some of these best management practices are required through the stormwater management rules (N.J.A.C. 7:8).  The 300-foot Special Water Resource Protection Area (SWRPA) established on either side of Category One streams and their tributaries is an additional best management practices applied to non point sources of pollution adjacent to Category One waters and their tributaries.  The buffer is intended to maintain the existing water quality of the receiving C1 waters by "polishing" runoff through filtration prior to its introduction to the Category One water.

>  Existing land uses within the watershed of a Category One water already contribute to the water quality of those surface waters.  Maintaining those land uses will not result in a measurable change in water quality in the Category One water.  Consequently, the stormwater management rules allow existing uses within the SWRPA to be maintained.  Further as elaborated below, there is no mechanism available to implement the stormwater management rules to existing development.  Therefore, the Department must rely on other non-regulatory means, such as 319(h) grants and the Farm Bill programs, to address water quality impacts that result from existing land uses.

>  However, additional encroachment within the SWRPA, including new agricultural development, is intended to be limited to previously disturbed areas.  Previously disturbed areas include existing active agricultural uses; however, it does not include areas where woody vegetation is present.  The difficulty in preventing new agricultural activities in previously undisturbed SWRPAs is that many agricultural activities are protected against municipal regulation through the Right to Farm Act (N.J.S.A. 4:1C).  As the stormwater management rules do not establish a regulatory program in and of itself, application of the rules relies on the Municipal Land Use Law and the Department's Land Use Regulation permits (Stream Encroachment, Freshwater Wetlands, Waterfront Development, Coastal Wetlands and CAFRA).  If a new agricultural activity is exempt from municipal regulation and does not need any of the Land Use Regulation permits, the rules cannot be applied except through the County Agriculture Development Board and the State Agricultural Development Committee.

>  For redevelopment within the SWRPA the stormwater rules allow that development in disturbed portions of the outer 150-feet of the SWRPA provided that the applicant demonstrates that the overall condition and functional value of the buffer will be maintained to the maximum extent practicable.  In the inner 150-feet of the buffer (closer to the water being protected) redevelopment is confined to the existing footprint of impervious surfaces.  All disturbed areas that are not paved in the inner 150-feet of the buffer on a site undergoing redevelopment, must be either restored or left undisturbed in perpetuity.  All undisturbed areas within the entire 300-foot SWRPA must also remain undisturbed in perpetuity.  The reasoning behind the allowance of certain redevelopment within the SWRPA relates back to the purpose of the Category One buffer: to prevent measurable change in water quality.

>  For example, standard agricultural practices include small buffer widths.  Together with tilling and grazing practices, agricultural land uses that do not employ best management practices, can contribute significant pollutants to the receiving waters, and can be one of the most damaging land uses to water quality.  Based on the USEPA Unit Area Loading Coefficients, the Total Suspended Solids load for agriculture is significantly higher than for residential runoff (300 lbs/ac/yr vs. 100-140 lbs/ac/yr).  For nutrients, the conversion of agricultural land to low-density residential development reduces the runoff loading (1.3lbsTP/ac/yr vs. .6lbsTP/ac/yr).  In areas where the outer 150 feet of the SWRPA is converted from agriculture to residential, the inner 150 feet will be allowed to revert to a natural vegetated cover, providing an additional vegetative filter from development runoff.  In some cases, additional buffer restoration measures including aggressive reforestation or a wider buffer may also be required depending on proposed land use intensity or site conditions such as slope.  This buffer as well as other stormwater management controls required under the Stormwater Management rules will further reduce impacts from residential development to mitigate nutrients loads from the new development.

>  Obviously, a functional value assessment of the SWRPA must be performed on a case-by-case basis, in consideration of the current condition of the SWRPA and up gradient land use as compared to the future condition of the SWRPA and up gradient land use.  However, where the existing SWRPA is so disturbed as to be non-existent, in most cases the restoration of 150-feet of buffer will vastly improve the functional value of the buffer.

>  I hope that this has answered your questions in this regard.  If not please feel free to write or call me.  A hard copy of this response is being forwarded to Sandy Batty under Assistant Commissioner Mauriello's signature as well.

>  Sincerely,

>  Lawrence J. Baier, Director

>  NJDEP, Division of Watershed Management

>  P.O. Box 418

>  Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0418

>  (609) 984-0058